zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. manwe1+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-22 02:26:55
That example would be two dimensions still in the limit computation, since you can keep building outwards (add buildings) but not scale upwards (add floors)
replies(1): >>frollo+y7
2. frollo+y7[view] [source] 2025-05-22 04:03:16
>>manwe1+(OP)
You can add floors though. Some datacenters are 8 stories with cross-floor network fabrics.
replies(1): >>immibi+Yx
◧◩
3. immibi+Yx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 09:18:20
>>frollo+y7
When you get to, say, 100000 stories, you can't build more stories. At this point your computer costs more than the Earth's GDP for a century, so talking about theoretical scaling laws is irrelevant. Eventually you run out of the sun's power output so you build a Dyson sphere and eventually use all of that power, anyway.
replies(1): >>frollo+Th1
◧◩◪
4. frollo+Th1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 15:40:53
>>immibi+Yx
Oh right, so the height is practically a constant. Square root for sure then.
replies(1): >>LPisGo+hb2
◧◩◪◨
5. LPisGo+hb2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 20:32:25
>>frollo+Th1
All algorithms are O(1) in this case
replies(1): >>frollo+5t2
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. frollo+5t2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-22 22:10:06
>>LPisGo+hb2
You pick what things are constant and what's variable. If you're scaling a supercomputer to fit a problem, the height is going to max out quickly and can be treated as constant, while the other dimensions are variable.
[go to top]