zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. qoez+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-21 12:31:21
They'll probably blame openai/the AI instead.
replies(1): >>nashas+L1
◧
2. nashas+L1[view] [source] 2025-05-21 12:45:35
>>qoez+(OP)
AI has reproducible outcomes. If someone else can make it work, then they should too.
replies(1): >>davegu+5p
◧◩
3. davegu+5p[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 15:11:16
>>nashas+L1
This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0?
replies(1): >>nashas+XE
◧◩◪
4. nashas+XE[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-21 16:42:23
>>davegu+5p
Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.
[go to top]