zlacker

I sometimes feel like that is the right outcome for bad management and bad instructions. Only this time they can’t blame the junior engineer and are left to only blame themselves.

>>nashas+(OP)
They'll probably blame openai/the AI instead.

>>qoez+n4
AI has reproducible outcomes. If someone else can make it work, then they should too.

>>nashas+86
This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0?

>>davegu+st
Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.

>>nashas+(OP)
I think we all know they won’t.

I am genuinely curious though to see the strategies they employ to absolve themselves of guilt and foolishness.

Is there precedent for the entire exec and management class embracing a new trend to this kind of extent, then it blowing up in their faces?