zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. precio+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-06 13:13:13
If the VS Code team are delivering the product, I have some amount of trust. If it’s the VS team, good luck to everyone involved
replies(4): >>deburo+62 >>pjmlp+sa >>ctkhn+PM >>slt202+SP
2. deburo+62[view] [source] 2025-05-06 13:24:58
>>precio+(OP)
Indeed, Copilot within Visual Studio is nowhere close as good as Copilot within VSCode, and even that is still worse than Cursor in my experience.
3. pjmlp+sa[view] [source] 2025-05-06 14:13:29
>>precio+(OP)
VSCode is still miles behind for .NET and C++ tooling, have a bit of fate on VS team.
replies(1): >>precio+4P
4. ctkhn+PM[view] [source] 2025-05-06 17:43:38
>>precio+(OP)
I use vscode for personal javascript projects but the time I spent on a .NET team using VS was an incredible downgrade compared to years and years of intellij. I ended up leaving because tech debt/bugs kept causing weekly overnight on call incidents that we were never given time to fix, but when they asked who wanted a Rider license I got myself on the list immediately.
◧◩
5. precio+4P[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 17:57:44
>>pjmlp+sa
What’s the use of being miles ahead if you’re traveling in the wrong direction?
replies(2): >>pjmlp+BY >>petefo+H31
6. slt202+SP[view] [source] 2025-05-06 18:02:50
>>precio+(OP)
VS developers are okay, it is the VS product managers that are The problem
◧◩◪
7. pjmlp+BY[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 18:56:42
>>precio+4P
Doesn't look like, given Windows market share.
replies(1): >>troupo+be1
◧◩◪
8. petefo+H31[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 19:32:49
>>precio+4P
Tell us you're not developing for microcontrollers without telling us you're not developing for microcontrollers.
◧◩◪◨
9. troupo+be1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 20:42:33
>>pjmlp+BY
Not just Windows. I find .net a better choice for backend/microservices than Java, for example
[go to top]