zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jiggaw+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-08 22:04:18
I just got a flashback to Trump enunciating “Clean coal, beautiful clean coal!”
replies(1): >>ZeroGr+uQ
2. ZeroGr+uQ[view] [source] 2025-04-09 08:53:49
>>jiggaw+(OP)
Almost exactly as you were making this comment he signed a bunch of stuff to "Reinvigorates America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry":

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-pr...

replies(2): >>jiggaw+MS >>rsynno+pa1
◧◩
3. jiggaw+MS[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 09:21:39
>>ZeroGr+uQ
And then he’s going to extort trading partners like the EU by essentially forcing them to buy polluting coal from the US or face ongoing sanctions.
replies(1): >>rsynno+La1
◧◩
4. rsynno+pa1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 12:43:42
>>ZeroGr+uQ
Oh, wow. I assumed you were joking about the title, but... Is he having a toddler ghost-write these for him now?
◧◩◪
5. rsynno+La1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 12:46:08
>>jiggaw+MS
This is what he's talking about, but... it doesn't make any sense, at all. What would "forcing the EU to buy coal" entail? The EU isn't a command economy and has no potential use for coal _itself_. The EU contains companies which require coal (albeit demand has been dropping for some time) but they're just going to buy whatever's cheapest, and particularly given it's _coal_, and has a very low value per tonne, that's generally more or less going to mean whatever's closest. Unless American coal was _radically_ cheaper than any other coal, it would be hard to cover the extra transport cost.
[go to top]