zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. blitza+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-08 21:00:50
95% of the world doesn't live in America, all the more for the rest of us. America can enjoy its beautiful coal.
replies(1): >>jiggaw+h8
2. jiggaw+h8[view] [source] 2025-04-08 22:04:18
>>blitza+(OP)
I just got a flashback to Trump enunciating “Clean coal, beautiful clean coal!”
replies(1): >>ZeroGr+LY
◧◩
3. ZeroGr+LY[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 08:53:49
>>jiggaw+h8
Almost exactly as you were making this comment he signed a bunch of stuff to "Reinvigorates America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry":

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-pr...

replies(2): >>jiggaw+311 >>rsynno+Gi1
◧◩◪
4. jiggaw+311[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 09:21:39
>>ZeroGr+LY
And then he’s going to extort trading partners like the EU by essentially forcing them to buy polluting coal from the US or face ongoing sanctions.
replies(1): >>rsynno+2j1
◧◩◪
5. rsynno+Gi1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 12:43:42
>>ZeroGr+LY
Oh, wow. I assumed you were joking about the title, but... Is he having a toddler ghost-write these for him now?
◧◩◪◨
6. rsynno+2j1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 12:46:08
>>jiggaw+311
This is what he's talking about, but... it doesn't make any sense, at all. What would "forcing the EU to buy coal" entail? The EU isn't a command economy and has no potential use for coal _itself_. The EU contains companies which require coal (albeit demand has been dropping for some time) but they're just going to buy whatever's cheapest, and particularly given it's _coal_, and has a very low value per tonne, that's generally more or less going to mean whatever's closest. Unless American coal was _radically_ cheaper than any other coal, it would be hard to cover the extra transport cost.
[go to top]