zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. gibson+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-05 18:06:29
My point is no type of math will work to model reason. Math is one of the many tools of reason, it is not the basis for reason. This is a very common error.
replies(1): >>csdvrx+S2
2. csdvrx+S2[view] [source] 2025-04-05 18:25:40
>>gibson+(OP)
> My point is no type of math will work to model reason

Then I disagree with you.

replies(2): >>gibson+w5 >>airstr+Nc
◧◩
3. gibson+w5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-05 18:40:27
>>csdvrx+S2
Exactly, we disagree and you are not alone in thinking this. You can use reason to do math, but your can't model reason with math.
◧◩
4. airstr+Nc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-05 19:24:23
>>csdvrx+S2
I'm ignorantly curious of what type of math will work in your view. Genuine question, I just want to be educated.
replies(1): >>gibson+1q
◧◩◪
5. gibson+1q[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-05 21:25:26
>>airstr+Nc
There is no type of math that can model conceptual reasoning. You can use conceptual reasoning, however, to do math.
replies(1): >>gugago+MR
◧◩◪◨
6. gugago+MR[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-06 03:09:36
>>gibson+1q
I think I know what math is, though I'm not sure. Logical systems of axioms and inference rules?

But I'm even less sure what conceptual reasoning is.

[go to top]