zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. abraxa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-04 03:51:06
Mostly latency. But even if a single robot could be driven by a data centre consider the energy and hardware investment requirements to make such a creature practical.
replies(3): >>UltraS+f2 >>Jensso+jt >>UltraS+Gl2
2. UltraS+f2[view] [source] 2025-04-04 04:20:26
>>abraxa+(OP)
Latency would be kept low be keeping the compute nearby. One 1U or 2U server per robot would be reasonable.
3. Jensso+jt[view] [source] 2025-04-04 09:31:02
>>abraxa+(OP)
1ms latency is more than fast enough, you probably have bigger latency than that between the cpu and the gpu.
replies(1): >>Symmet+pN
◧◩
4. Symmet+pN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-04 12:23:31
>>Jensso+jt
We've got 10ms of latency between our brains and our hands along our nerve fibers and we function all right.
5. UltraS+Gl2[view] [source] 2025-04-04 20:16:27
>>abraxa+(OP)
The Figure robots use a two level control scheme with a fast LLM at 200Hz directly controlling the robot and a slow planning LLM running at 7Hz. This planning LLM could be very far away indeed and still have less than 142.8ms of latency.
[go to top]