zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. UltraS+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-04 02:59:02
Why can't the compute be remote from the robot? That is a major advantage of human technology over biology.
replies(1): >>abraxa+Y3
2. abraxa+Y3[view] [source] 2025-04-04 03:51:06
>>UltraS+(OP)
Mostly latency. But even if a single robot could be driven by a data centre consider the energy and hardware investment requirements to make such a creature practical.
replies(3): >>UltraS+d6 >>Jensso+hx >>UltraS+Ep2
◧◩
3. UltraS+d6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-04 04:20:26
>>abraxa+Y3
Latency would be kept low be keeping the compute nearby. One 1U or 2U server per robot would be reasonable.
◧◩
4. Jensso+hx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-04 09:31:02
>>abraxa+Y3
1ms latency is more than fast enough, you probably have bigger latency than that between the cpu and the gpu.
replies(1): >>Symmet+nR
◧◩◪
5. Symmet+nR[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-04 12:23:31
>>Jensso+hx
We've got 10ms of latency between our brains and our hands along our nerve fibers and we function all right.
◧◩
6. UltraS+Ep2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-04 20:16:27
>>abraxa+Y3
The Figure robots use a two level control scheme with a fast LLM at 200Hz directly controlling the robot and a slow planning LLM running at 7Hz. This planning LLM could be very far away indeed and still have less than 142.8ms of latency.
[go to top]