zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. bitshi+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-03-04 23:37:06
My question was about the evidence. For example, Trump introduced a 25% tariff on steel in early 2018, and yet we didn't see any unusual inflation until after the COVID stimulus.
replies(2): >>seanmc+61 >>fredop+Yt
2. seanmc+61[view] [source] 2025-03-04 23:46:29
>>bitshi+(OP)
No, I think you remember it wrong. US steel companies raised prices back in 2018 as well. It was just that it was one tariff at the one time, and many companies were able to avoid it by moving production overseas (the tax didn't apply to goods made with steel, just steel itself).

This time, there are more tariffs coming at the same time, and the trick of moving production abroad to avoid steel tariffs is no longer viable.

replies(1): >>bitshi+Z2
◧◩
3. bitshi+Z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 00:08:25
>>seanmc+61
In this comment chain, I have already clarified that by "inflation," I'm not referring to how an items price goes up after it becomes subject to a tariff. I'm referring to overall inflation in goods and services. You can see the rate of inflation from March of 2018 to the beginning of the COVID stimulus here: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL
replies(1): >>seanmc+64
◧◩◪
4. seanmc+64[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 00:19:37
>>bitshi+Z2
If you tariff a small section of the economy, you aren't going to see much movement. Producers can adjust by moving production abroad (to avoid raw input tariffs) and by moving production to home (to avoid final assembly tariffs) (often a combination of both).

Trump's 2018 tariffs were narrow enough that they were easy to digest. Trump's 2025 tariffs are fairly broad and we won't be able to move production around in multiple places to deal with it, so much of the economy is going to eat the cost directly. So if money supply stays the same, Americans simply reduce their lifestyle to compensate (buy 25% less stuff, eat 25% less food), but I don't think that Trump (as someone who is addicted to excess) will see that as viable, so money is going to be printed and injected into the economy somehow.

5. fredop+Yt[view] [source] 2025-03-05 04:25:32
>>bitshi+(OP)
I was able to find an article[0] showing job losses from Trump's first term tariffs but nothing concrete about inflation.

Despite not having concrete proof, I think there's a fairly plausible chain of events from tariffs to broader price increases. Trump's tariffs include a 10% tariff on Canadian oil and gas. If you're in a region that relies heavily on these things coming from Canada you're going to see prices go up on your monthly energy bills, fuel for your vehicle, etc. This also affects local businesses and directly increases their costs. Businesses can only absorb so much of an increase before they raise prices. Now you're able to buy even less between your increased monthly expenses and the higher prices in stores. This makes you go to your boss and ask for a raise just so you can keep up with what your purchasing power used to be. If your boss gives you that raise, the business sees their expenses go up again and may need to raise prices as a result.

In the scenario I described above, what step do you think won't happen that allows us to prevent higher energy prices from leading to inflation?

[0] https://carnegieendowment.org/china-financial-markets/2021/0...

replies(1): >>bitshi+Pc2
◧◩
6. bitshi+Pc2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 17:11:43
>>fredop+Yt
I believe taxes in general have a cooling effect on the economy and are ultimately deflationary. I also think it's possible we could enter a recession. If so, it would trigger fiscal expansion, which usually triggers inflation in turn. But tariffs in a vacuum: deflationary to neutral once the economy has time to react and adjust.
replies(1): >>fredop+Rl2
◧◩◪
7. fredop+Rl2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 17:57:17
>>bitshi+Pc2
I'm going to rephrase your position to make sure I understand it correctly. Please feel free to correct anything I get wrong below.

Tariffs result in higher costs to consumers in the short term due to the additional tax consumers have to pay. This extra tax is harmful to the economy. The reduction in economic growth is deflationary and sufficient to counter inflationary pressure from higher prices on tariffed goods. As a result, tariffs should lead to deflation or have at most a neutral effect on inflation.

Did I sum that up correctly?

replies(1): >>bitshi+ot2
◧◩◪◨
8. bitshi+ot2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 18:34:03
>>fredop+Rl2
> and sufficient to counter inflationary pressure from higher prices on tariffed goods.

I'm not sure there is overall inflationary pressure from the higher prices on tariffed goods, but yes. It's a dynamic system, and I believe that people change their behavior and buying patterns in response to taxes. This is my belief, and I have no real evidence other than the fact that the rate of CPI growth did not increase after the 2018 tariffs until after the COVID stimulus came into effect.

[go to top]