zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-18 04:03:24
Yes, generated comments aren't allowed here and that has been the case since before GPTs. HN is for humans.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

(see also >>22427782 and similar)

We haven't added a specific rule to the guidelines about it (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) but we may end up having to.

What's tricky is that accusing other commenters of being bots/AIs is, at the same time, a new twist on the "you're a shill/astroturfer/troll/bot/spy" etc. swipe that internet users love to hurl at each other, and which we do have a guideline against (for good reason).

Between those two rules (or quasi-rules) there's a lot of room to get things wrong and I'm sorry I misread the above case!

replies(1): >>searea+y8
2. searea+y8[view] [source] 2025-02-18 05:55:27
>>dang+(OP)
Thank you. Maybe you can remove my slow-ban, and we'll call it even: HN often tells me I am posting too fast, which makes me think my account was flagged at some point.
replies(1): >>dang+xf
◧◩
3. dang+xf[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-18 07:24:03
>>searea+y8
That is a separate question, and it would be better sent to hn@ycombinator.com (this is in https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html btw). But since you asked here, I'll respond here:

We rate limit accounts when they post too many low-quality comments and/or get involved in flamewars. I'd be happy to take the rate limit off your account, but when I look at your recent comments, I still see too many that match that description:

>>43086219

>>43073768

>>42528111

>>42301901

>>42242363

If you want to build up a track record of using HN as intended for a while, you'd be welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and we can take a look and hopefully take the rate limit off your account.

replies(1): >>searea+kh
◧◩◪
4. searea+kh[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-18 07:40:41
>>dang+xf
I see. I guess succinctness is punished here. I guess I'll use AI to puff up my comments in the future. Thanks!

For reference, the GGGP comment was generated using this prompt:

    turn this small reply into an extremely verbose, very long 
    comment: Outside of my accusation. Does HN have any 
    guidelines on using chatgpt comments?
replies(1): >>dang+ER1
◧◩◪◨
5. dang+ER1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-18 18:14:10
>>searea+kh
Succinctness isn't the issue.
[go to top]