zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. james4+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-17 07:20:15
Thank you for expounding. I can only assume we're talking about empathy from the real estate lobbyists who control housing policy.
replies(2): >>robert+1b >>danem+9w1
2. robert+1b[view] [source] 2025-02-17 09:16:57
>>james4+(OP)
The state controls housing policy.
replies(1): >>james4+ff
◧◩
3. james4+ff[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 09:56:41
>>robert+1b
Everyone is so informative here. Thank you.
replies(1): >>Redoub+z31
◧◩◪
4. Redoub+z31[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 15:55:24
>>james4+ff
To be direct, construction would look much more like Austin, which has lowered rents by actually builds things, if your vision of the case were true.

https://x.com/sp6runderrated/status/1879257360344199255?s=46...

To act like housing policy is controlled by developers, even in this contemptuous jest you exude, is delirious and is the remainder of the problem with San Francisco.

replies(1): >>james4+612
5. danem+9w1[view] [source] 2025-02-17 18:41:27
>>james4+(OP)
I promise you, its not the "real estate lobbyists" who fought to block subsidized housing for teachers in the Sunset.
◧◩◪◨
6. james4+612[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 22:28:38
>>Redoub+z31
I misinterpreted you as implying a libertarian anti-state argument. I had thought I was returning the same energy.

My apologies.

replies(1): >>robert+mm6
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. robert+mm6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-19 10:24:32
>>james4+612
I was the person you replied to, and there was no "energy", whatever that is, in what I said. Just: you blame the state for state corruption, because we pay them taxes to not be corrupt.
[go to top]