zlacker

Yes. Bad feel-good policies are the vast majority of the problem

>>Redoub+(OP)
Thank you for expounding. I can only assume we're talking about empathy from the real estate lobbyists who control housing policy.

>>james4+E3
The state controls housing policy.

>>robert+Fe
Everyone is so informative here. Thank you.

>>james4+Ti
To be direct, construction would look much more like Austin, which has lowered rents by actually builds things, if your vision of the case were true.

https://x.com/sp6runderrated/status/1879257360344199255?s=46...

To act like housing policy is controlled by developers, even in this contemptuous jest you exude, is delirious and is the remainder of the problem with San Francisco.

>>james4+E3
I promise you, its not the "real estate lobbyists" who fought to block subsidized housing for teachers in the Sunset.

>>Redoub+d71
I misinterpreted you as implying a libertarian anti-state argument. I had thought I was returning the same energy.

My apologies.

>>james4+K42
I was the person you replied to, and there was no "energy", whatever that is, in what I said. Just: you blame the state for state corruption, because we pay them taxes to not be corrupt.