zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. snapca+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-23 14:11:47
Come on man why are you doing this? I didn't say censorship was the same in america or china you're just trying to find something to disagree with
replies(1): >>throwa+Zx1
2. throwa+Zx1[view] [source] 2025-01-24 03:10:05
>>snapca+(OP)
> Why would China censoring Tiananmen Square/whatever out of their LLMs be anymore harmful to the training process when the US controlled LLMs also censor certain topics, eg "how do I make meth?" or "how do I make a nuclear bomb?".

I was explaining why it is more harmful and thought you were arguing it is not harmful?

replies(1): >>snapca+Di2
◧◩
3. snapca+Di2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-24 13:54:39
>>throwa+Zx1
I was just making a very simple narrow claim: Censorship in the west and china are both done by unelected people. Note that i didn't say china was good, censorship was equivalent or anything else you're trying to argue. my literal only point was:

Censorship in the west and china are both done by unelected people

replies(1): >>throwa+E94
◧◩◪
4. throwa+E94[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-25 07:32:12
>>snapca+Di2
OK you are technically correct. We can talk how "appointed by elected people" makes a difference...
[go to top]