zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. loeg+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 04:11:10
Nah. I just wanted to see a source I trusted to be legitimate before sharing a sensational story.
replies(2): >>frinxo+f >>kernal+Fn
2. frinxo+f[view] [source] 2025-01-22 04:13:02
>>loeg+(OP)
if its on front page of HN already w/ hundreds of votes, i think its fair to assume its legitimate regardless of the source.
replies(1): >>loeg+67
◧◩
3. loeg+67[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 05:30:27
>>frinxo+f
True looking nonsense floats to the top of HN semi-regularly; it's not a good enough metric.
4. kernal+Fn[view] [source] 2025-01-22 08:20:20
>>loeg+(OP)
What far left sources do you consider “trusted”?
replies(1): >>loeg+Wr2
◧◩
5. loeg+Wr2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 22:46:23
>>kernal+Fn
I don't think this is responsive to my comment. I'm happy to trust reporting from NYT, Reuters, AP, WSJ, Wapo, Bloomberg, major regional newspapers... it's not a super high or politicized bar. Just something other than "a single twitter account."
[go to top]