zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. philom+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:15:08
But why drop $500B (or even $100B short term) if there is not something there? The numbers are too big
replies(2): >>camel_+67 >>rf15+Bx
2. camel_+67[view] [source] 2025-01-22 04:20:41
>>philom+(OP)
this is an announcement not a cut check. Who knows how much they'll actually spend, plenty of projects never get started let alone massive inter-company endeavors.
replies(1): >>dark_g+Be
◧◩
3. dark_g+Be[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 05:42:50
>>camel_+67
The $100B check is already cut, and they are currently building 10 new data centers in Texas.
replies(1): >>__loam+wv
◧◩◪
4. __loam+wv[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 08:36:23
>>dark_g+Be
A state with famously stable power infrastructure.
replies(1): >>nejsjs+2T
5. rf15+Bx[view] [source] 2025-01-22 08:53:18
>>philom+(OP)
because you put your own people on the receiving end too AND invite others to join your spending spree.
◧◩◪◨
6. nejsjs+2T[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 12:16:20
>>__loam+wv
$50B is to pay miners not to mine.
[go to top]