zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. catman+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 00:04:49
This has nothing to do with technology it is a purely financial and political exercise...
replies(1): >>philom+2q
2. philom+2q[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:15:08
>>catman+(OP)
But why drop $500B (or even $100B short term) if there is not something there? The numbers are too big
replies(2): >>camel_+8x >>rf15+DX
◧◩
3. camel_+8x[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 04:20:41
>>philom+2q
this is an announcement not a cut check. Who knows how much they'll actually spend, plenty of projects never get started let alone massive inter-company endeavors.
replies(1): >>dark_g+DE
◧◩◪
4. dark_g+DE[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 05:42:50
>>camel_+8x
The $100B check is already cut, and they are currently building 10 new data centers in Texas.
replies(1): >>__loam+yV
◧◩◪◨
5. __loam+yV[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 08:36:23
>>dark_g+DE
A state with famously stable power infrastructure.
replies(1): >>nejsjs+4j1
◧◩
6. rf15+DX[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 08:53:18
>>philom+2q
because you put your own people on the receiving end too AND invite others to join your spending spree.
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. nejsjs+4j1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 12:16:20
>>__loam+yV
$50B is to pay miners not to mine.
[go to top]