zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. intern+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:59:37
If every reply is pointing out how confusing it is, maybe the original comment is just poorly written.
replies(1): >>wolfga+82
2. wolfga+82[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:18:17
>>intern+(OP)
You’re not going to hear from the people who thought it made perfect sense, so the replies are a pretty biased sample. (This is also true of the parent complaint about reading comprehension, tbh.) But I see three confused replies and three corrections (not counting my own), so it doesn’t seem to be every reply.

I think the problem is that I took an artistic style in an attempt to paint a picture for the reader, but I did it in a long thread on a technical forum where people are probably mostly skimming rather than engaging in literary criticism, so I should maybe have anticipated this would be a problem.

replies(1): >>vonuno+x8
◧◩
3. vonuno+x8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 04:18:16
>>wolfga+82
I thought it was fine, I wasn't confused for a moment. The only real problem here is that HN attracts a certain brand of nerds who are inclined to think it's hilarious when Maurice Moss says "Yes, it's one of those", many of whom are likely frothing right now because I just committed a comma splice in the previous sentence.
[go to top]