zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. wolfga+qc[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:41:28
>>Ozarki+(OP)
Tangentially related: I had the disconcerting experience of reading a Wired article about his arrest[1] while unknowingly sitting about six feet from the spot where he was apprehended. When I read that the FBI agents had stopped at Bello Coffee while preparing their stakeout, I thought, huh, interesting coincidence, I just had a coffee there.

Then Ulbricht walked into the public library and sat down at the table directly in front of me, and suddenly as I was reading I could look up and see exactly the chair he had been in, where the plainclothes police had positioned themselves, how they had arranged a distraction.

Having this tableau unexpectedly unfold right in front of my eyes was a fascinating experience, and it certainly made the article suddenly get a lot more immersive!

[1] https://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-2/

EDIT: to be clear, I was not present for the arrest. I was reading the magazine, some years after the arrest, but in the same place as the arrest. (I didn’t qualify the events with “I read that...” since I thought the narrative ellipsis would be obvious from context; evidently not.)

◧◩
2. colive+Kl[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:44:36
>>wolfga+qc
The responses to this comment show that people's ability to read and comprehend text has decreased dramatically in the last few years. Frightening...
◧◩◪
3. intern+xn[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:59:37
>>colive+Kl
If every reply is pointing out how confusing it is, maybe the original comment is just poorly written.
◧◩◪◨
4. wolfga+Fp[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:18:17
>>intern+xn
You’re not going to hear from the people who thought it made perfect sense, so the replies are a pretty biased sample. (This is also true of the parent complaint about reading comprehension, tbh.) But I see three confused replies and three corrections (not counting my own), so it doesn’t seem to be every reply.

I think the problem is that I took an artistic style in an attempt to paint a picture for the reader, but I did it in a long thread on a technical forum where people are probably mostly skimming rather than engaging in literary criticism, so I should maybe have anticipated this would be a problem.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. vonuno+4w[view] [source] 2025-01-22 04:18:16
>>wolfga+Fp
I thought it was fine, I wasn't confused for a moment. The only real problem here is that HN attracts a certain brand of nerds who are inclined to think it's hilarious when Maurice Moss says "Yes, it's one of those", many of whom are likely frothing right now because I just committed a comma splice in the previous sentence.
[go to top]