zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. pjc50+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-21 09:44:46
Presumably "apply a content warning label"?
replies(1): >>Retr0i+L
2. Retr0i+L[view] [source] 2025-01-21 09:49:50
>>pjc50+(OP)
Which is a strange thing to write on Mastodon, which afaik doesn't let anyone except the author label their own posts.
replies(1): >>davidt+X6
◧◩
3. davidt+X6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 10:39:28
>>Retr0i+L
Which is why people will frequently repost things wrapped in a CW. Hence the request not to do that, so people see it.
replies(1): >>Retr0i+r8
◧◩◪
4. Retr0i+r8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 10:51:06
>>davidt+X6
But why make the request to yourself?
replies(1): >>davidt+Ob
◧◩◪◨
5. davidt+Ob[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 11:15:09
>>Retr0i+r8
Eh? It's a request to anyone reposting it.
replies(1): >>Retr0i+Sc
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. Retr0i+Sc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 11:23:06
>>davidt+Ob
Even a repost can't edit/add a CW (which is why adding a CW to your post, counter-intuitively, will often net your post more visibility, since many feel uncomfortable reposting un-CW'd posts)
replies(1): >>davidt+fk
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. davidt+fk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 12:30:06
>>Retr0i+Sc
No, you're talking about boosting (equivalent to retweeting).

As you say, you can't add a CW doing that.

So, people re-post manually (the content of the post, and/or a link to the post) with a CW.

The request is not to do that.

[go to top]