zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. Hamuko+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-21 09:44:08
What does "don’t CW this" mean?
replies(1): >>pjc50+5
2. pjc50+5[view] [source] 2025-01-21 09:44:46
>>Hamuko+(OP)
Presumably "apply a content warning label"?
replies(1): >>Retr0i+Q
◧◩
3. Retr0i+Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 09:49:50
>>pjc50+5
Which is a strange thing to write on Mastodon, which afaik doesn't let anyone except the author label their own posts.
replies(1): >>davidt+27
◧◩◪
4. davidt+27[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 10:39:28
>>Retr0i+Q
Which is why people will frequently repost things wrapped in a CW. Hence the request not to do that, so people see it.
replies(1): >>Retr0i+w8
◧◩◪◨
5. Retr0i+w8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 10:51:06
>>davidt+27
But why make the request to yourself?
replies(1): >>davidt+Tb
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. davidt+Tb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 11:15:09
>>Retr0i+w8
Eh? It's a request to anyone reposting it.
replies(1): >>Retr0i+Xc
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. Retr0i+Xc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 11:23:06
>>davidt+Tb
Even a repost can't edit/add a CW (which is why adding a CW to your post, counter-intuitively, will often net your post more visibility, since many feel uncomfortable reposting un-CW'd posts)
replies(1): >>davidt+kk
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. davidt+kk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 12:30:06
>>Retr0i+Xc
No, you're talking about boosting (equivalent to retweeting).

As you say, you can't add a CW doing that.

So, people re-post manually (the content of the post, and/or a link to the post) with a CW.

The request is not to do that.

[go to top]