zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. acuozz+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-13 20:46:47
> Consumers can assess the credibility of each.

Assuming intelligence is normally distributed, then what's the plan for the bottom 50% here?

replies(1): >>baggy_+f7
◧
2. baggy_+f7[view] [source] 2025-01-13 21:13:47
>>acuozz+(OP)
As stated.
replies(1): >>acuozz+zB2
◧◩
3. acuozz+zB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-14 16:08:51
>>baggy_+f7
Understood. It's an interesting long-term strategy to revive Feudalism.
replies(1): >>baggy_+bT2
◧◩◪
4. baggy_+bT2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-14 17:03:42
>>acuozz+zB2
More a strategy to avoid totalitarianism.
replies(1): >>acuozz+hi3
◧◩◪◨
5. acuozz+hi3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-14 18:32:26
>>baggy_+bT2
By leaving the bottom 50% to be propagandized by populists?

If we were still living in the time of thirteen channels and Walter Cronkite on the CBS Evening News, I'd be inclined to agree with you.

replies(1): >>baggy_+wo3
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. baggy_+wo3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-14 18:58:11
>>acuozz+hi3
An elite thinking that they know the truth and should suppress falsehoods is much more dangerous, so yes.
[go to top]