zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. achene+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-16 14:10:10
what if you study Mexican drug cartels, and you find that they have a certain method of communication that enables them to communicate more efficiently.

You copy this communication in your non-profit organization that feeds starving children and find that you are able to feed 50% more children when communicating with this more efficient method.

This is not "literally cocaine logic", it's learning from others.

To use an example you'll probably agree with more: You can hate the lyrics of a given musical artist but copy their production style and in doing so give your lyrics a better platform from which to be heard.

Methods != end goals

You can adapt effective methods currently used to accomplish questionable things to accomplish more noble things.

although, to be perfectly honest, I doubt you'd learn much from Mexican drug cartels that would apply to software, as the markets are completely different.

replies(1): >>Ygg2+k7
2. Ygg2+k7[view] [source] 2024-09-16 14:51:39
>>achene+(OP)
> Methods != end goals

Ok, but the methods (hustle, grind-culture, high pressure on marks) are here just as questionable as the end goals (Be the biggest Youtuber).

What can you learn from Mr. Beast? Nothing that a lack of conscience and some basic psychology of engagement couldn't teach you.

To reuse your analogy, what if you could communicate information by arranging the corpses of your enemies in a certain pattern, then use international news reports to get the messages across.

What could this teach us about communication? Nothing.

replies(1): >>nother+Ot
◧◩
3. nother+Ot[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 17:01:17
>>Ygg2+k7
We learn that they operate on a culture of radical accountability. They are also a pressure cooker organization that micro manages hard and expects employees to pull all nighters
[go to top]