zlacker

[parent] [thread] 19 comments
1. Karrot+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-15 23:21:22
The "sour grapes" attitude has IMO really started crowding out other content. Pretty much any popular content here just has a flood of social signaling content all about how morally wrong, bad, evil, etc the content is. And if you don't want to pile on the commentary, which is all pretty much the same thing regurgitated in different ways, then your content just kinda languishes at the bottom of the page. I don't really know why this kind of content is so engaging but I guess it is. Kinda like a sports match where everyone just shouts at how bad the other team is or something.

EDIT: My pet theory is that it has to do with the general aging of the users here. There's a kind of well-to-do, Western, mid-40s (usually male) social opinion I see upvoted a lot here that I feel like hits the sweet spot of the folks who still read this site regularly. But it's just a theory really.

replies(6): >>__loam+s >>devjab+Ka >>mrmeta+Na >>czhu12+Df >>throw1+1j >>cruffl+Ms2
2. __loam+s[view] [source] 2024-09-15 23:27:17
>>Karrot+(OP)
It would help if half the content on this site wasn't highly unethical lol. It feels like the tech industry is having a moment where a lot of us are looking critically at the work we're doing and the effects it has on the society we live in. Sometimes that's not fun but it is important. Sorry if that checks the vibes too much for you.
replies(1): >>Karrot+c1
◧◩
3. Karrot+c1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-15 23:34:29
>>__loam+s
Okay so now what effect are you having by making this ethical criticism? Are you changing the ethical outlook of the industry? Are you making a positive ethical impact?

> It feels like the tech industry is having a moment where a lot of us are looking critically at the work we're doing and the effects it has on the society we live in.

I think you grossly overestimate HN's prominence in the tech industry. It was where all the founders hung out 15 years ago. It's now just a place where IT workers talk.

> Sometimes that's not fun but it is important. Sorry if that checks the vibes too much for you.

No I just do what everyone else does which is talk about tech elsewhere. I spent a lot of time over the last 15 years here so I'm sad that the place has changed, but at the end of the day I have several alternatives.

Moreover there's plenty of problems in the world out there. A few wars in progress, a genocide or two. My relatives spent the last few weeks in hiding because a government failed. MrBeast's engagement practices are probably the very lowest of my worries. If only HN comments could change the world...

replies(4): >>__loam+I1 >>Glacie+y5 >>j33zus+a7 >>twojac+Q7
◧◩◪
4. __loam+I1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-15 23:39:40
>>Karrot+c1
> Are you changing the ethical outlook of the industry? Are you making a positive ethical impact?

I try pretty hard to only work on companies that have at least a neutral impact on society. Many of them have had an actively positive one.

> I think you grossly overestimate HN's prominence in the tech industry.

It's a good thing I wasn't talking solely about hackernews then.

◧◩◪
5. Glacie+y5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 00:30:44
>>Karrot+c1
Hey everyone, let's take a leaf out of this guys book and only mention ethical concerns if he deems them worthy - like wars for example. Anything lower than that isn't worth mentioning because it kills the vibes. Wonder if he'll see this as he doesn't use this site anymore and talks with the intellectual founder-boys elsewhere...
◧◩◪
6. j33zus+a7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 00:54:21
>>Karrot+c1
Founders aren’t here, but all the workers are, and they’re overestimating HN’s prominence? Or are you overvaluing the position of founder. Like you’re on some Randian philosophy shit, or something.
◧◩◪
7. twojac+Q7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 01:02:49
>>Karrot+c1
> I think you grossly overestimate HN's prominence in the tech industry. It was where all the founders hung out 15 years ago. It's now just a place where IT workers talk.

You either missed the point of the GP comment, or you think that it's entirely pointless to discuss important issues unless it's with people of prominence. Depressing if it's the latter, but given how you started your post, I'm leaning toward that interpretation. That's some kind of fucked up elitism right there.

8. devjab+Ka[view] [source] 2024-09-16 01:45:12
>>Karrot+(OP)
I think it mostly happened when HN became flooded by Reddit users. One of the reason I think this is because of how HN and Reddits way of dealing with new lines is different. In a lot of the comments on HN that I would consider to be fitting on GPs point you’ll see a format a long the lines of this:

This is the first line of my paragraph.

This is the second line of my paragraph.

They are separated because HN and Reddit formatting is different.

replies(2): >>mkl+Nl >>rootsu+im
9. mrmeta+Na[view] [source] 2024-09-16 01:46:09
>>Karrot+(OP)
This site has a lot of interesting people that did and do interesting "hacker" type things that keep me coming back, but a lot of commenting is people looking to build things of questionable value, legality, or social good and sell them off and gtfo before the cracks show.

Less "Hacker" More "Greed via Computer" So the idea that they aren't bothered by Mr Beast's lack of integrity is because they too find deceit acceptable so long as they profit. Because, someone else before him did, so why shouldn't he? It's toxic greed all the way down in this view.

the bizarre social Darwinism nonsense that permeates the internet has done a nice job of taking this antisocial mindset - passersby at a glance recognize it quite rightly as the ideology of the asshole - and rebranded it as 'smart' and a mere recognition of the 'real world' (much to the confusion of people succeeding and enjoying the company of others doing so without robbing one another)

replies(4): >>troad+Zc >>robots+0j >>seizet+Gj >>Jerrrr+cq
◧◩
10. troad+Zc[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 02:13:52
>>mrmeta+Na
Thank you for putting this in words; it's been rattling around in my head too.

I feel like the Peter Thiel world has eaten the Moxie Marlinspike world, and this is such a huge, monstrous loss for intellectual curiosity, individual liberty, and human flourishing.

11. czhu12+Df[view] [source] 2024-09-16 02:46:38
>>Karrot+(OP)
Could not agree more, these days I feel like I only really read more technical posts where "sour grapes" comments are hard to insert. Basically anything about politics, tech, finance, management, news, the top few comments are so predictably negative its exhausting.
◧◩
12. robots+0j[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 03:28:40
>>mrmeta+Na
I wonder if it would be possible to create a clone of HN without a pervasive reactionary tendency, and what you'd need to tweak to make that work.
13. throw1+1j[view] [source] 2024-09-16 03:28:42
>>Karrot+(OP)
> Pretty much any popular content here just has a flood of social signaling content all about how morally wrong, bad, evil, etc the content is.

I've noticed a similar general trend for some kinds of posts. (the more technical ones tend to escape this) The fix is that when you see posts with that kind of social signaling, downvote and flag them.

The downvote is because these posts are always extremely uninteresting, low-effort, and detrimental to HN as a whole.

The flag is because these posts almost always break the HN guidelines in multiple ways, e.g. "Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.", "Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle.", "Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread."

This is one of the few ways that we can continue to avoid HN from turning into Reddit - by self-moderating. Dang seems to take a light touch to moderation and does almost zero curation, so it's up to the users to help keep HN about intellectual curiosity and avoid degenerating into Reddit.

◧◩
14. seizet+Gj[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 03:38:16
>>mrmeta+Na
Wait. You’re answering why this site is flooded with morale outrage with us vs them moral outrage?
replies(1): >>mrmeta+4bb
◧◩
15. mkl+Nl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 04:08:37
>>devjab+Ka
I think that's because people are commenting on mobile, where the lines are way shorter. What looks like a paragraph on my phone (e.g. this comment), turns out to just be a line or two.
◧◩
16. rootsu+im[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 04:13:26
>>devjab+Ka
This is also how 4chan differentiated users, by double space and ironically using >greentext wrong. I thought it was ironic to see this comment here, because, I've been using the old 4chan archives as datasets for interesting things. https://archive.org/details/imageboard_datasets
replies(1): >>Jerrrr+nq
◧◩
17. Jerrrr+cq[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 05:08:09
>>mrmeta+Na
the insightful intelligent discourse that this site's audience brings often lets the darker side of that blessing - resentment for the successful - to surface.

whether that is convenient altruism masquerading as a disdain for greed or sheer jealousy at their own lack of agency or fortuna or virtu is for their own ego to hopefully one day confront.

◧◩◪
18. Jerrrr+nq[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 05:10:19
>>rootsu+im
>doubly ironic is that 99% of HN users use both of those supported features

  completely incorrectly
19. cruffl+Ms2[view] [source] 2024-09-16 20:54:16
>>Karrot+(OP)
Slashdot got like that way back 20 years ago... every article about technology was a bunch of gumps wondering why we would ever need whatever tech the article was about.

It's pretty out of touch, exhausting and kinda makes me feel embarrassed for whoever posted it.

People think they are so high and mighty and have everything figured out. The fact is, they are just an average human trying to make it through this world like everyone else. Just like me, just like you. Nobody has it figured out.

And to go back onto topic, I thought the leaked PDF was fascinating. There is a lot of good management stuff in that document.

◧◩◪
20. mrmeta+4bb[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-19 17:37:15
>>seizet+Gj
Read it again slower ;) There's no outrage, and there's no us vs them. unless you identify personally with greed. I never thought of greed as a 'them' - are you a greed?
[go to top]