zlacker

This is actually a really good document for someone who is a junior or assistant. I've worked a variety of jobs and didn't get much documents on training like this, mostly compliance stuff. You could take a lot of it out and get good points on managing people and taking ownership for tasks. It seems redundant or basic, but a lot of these things aren't explicitly mentioned, usually informally only.

>>dayvid+(OP)
It is nice to see the red flags in writing ahead of time. After all "boys will be boys"

>>paulry+zd
That’s there, but the parts about taking responsibility for your work, keeping people you delegate work to accountable and negotiating with vendors and being persistent is stuff you usually get informally.

I also find those signs that it’s a more honest document. Most things publicly available are so neutered there’s not much useful grey info

>>dayvid+7n
It's hypocritical, those closest to Jimmy have get-out-of-jail-free cards and others get fired. And the "no doesn't mean no" stuff reeks of toxic hustle culture.

Most handbooks are boring and legalese because they can be evidence in court.

>>dayvid+(OP)
You are correct. There are way too many assistant roles in the creative industry that come with little to none real job training, just “watch what I do, or do as I tell, and never make a mistake twice or you’re toast”.

I think it’s due to the sheer amount of candidates, and the total power some superiors have over you.

It’s a sink or swim strategy, but you’re also swimming with sharks.