zlacker

[parent] [thread] 32 comments
1. hnpoli+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:16:56
The HN crowd is far right but they would never admit it. Most people are unaware of how political parties shift in composition and ideology over the decades.

The contemporary American software engineer resembles the professional class Reagan Republicans who dominated the suburbs in the 80's and 90's.

replies(6): >>gruez+p1 >>alsetm+u1 >>JohnMa+B1 >>hn-890+X1 >>bodiek+dd >>hnpoli+Jv1
2. gruez+p1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:23:14
>>hnpoli+(OP)
>The HN crowd is far right

???

Is anyone who isn't a card carrying DSA member "far right"?

replies(1): >>hnpoli+o6
3. alsetm+u1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:23:31
>>hnpoli+(OP)
Center-right, I'd argue, but that's true of the Democratic party. HN is very far from far-right in that bigotry and racism isn't tolerated here (nor should they be). But HN is USA in origin and USA politics are further right than most of Europe.
replies(4): >>sangno+S3 >>hnpoli+68 >>Sunspa+S9 >>conste+gx
4. JohnMa+B1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:24:02
>>hnpoli+(OP)
This observation is always highlighted by the absurdity of american politics when they describe candidates like Joe Biden as "far left" when on the european political spectrum (or even an absolute one, if such a thing exists) he'd almost certainly be on the right.
replies(1): >>gruez+L2
5. hn-890+X1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:25:41
>>hnpoli+(OP)
"Far right" as measured by a hardcore leftie, maybe. If you stand against illegal immigration, criticize superficial DEI "me-too" gestures that do nothing to solve the real issues underneath, or are moderately conservative in any other way, you will have you comments routinely downvoted into oblivion and will be called a Nazi and the second coming of Hitler. Not only in this place, it has become the the norm these days.
replies(2): >>hnpoli+hd >>Jasser+Rr
◧◩
6. gruez+L2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:29:23
>>JohnMa+B1
>This observation is always highlighted by the absurdity of american politics when they describe candidates like Joe Biden as "far left"

Joe Biden is by all accounts, center-left. However, the parent comment also describes the "HN crowd" as far-right. What probably is actually happening is that America is extremely polarized, where any side you don't agree with has the "far-[left/right]" label slapped on.

replies(3): >>JohnMa+B4 >>halost+75 >>hnpoli+T9
◧◩
7. sangno+S3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:36:07
>>alsetm+u1
> HN is very far from far-right in that bigotry and racism isn't tolerated here (nor should they be).

As in no outright slurs, right? I've seen plenty of race realist comments, as well as "James Damore is right about women in tech".

◧◩◪
8. JohnMa+B4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:40:41
>>gruez+L2
Not trying to start a political discussion but people describing someone like biden as center-left are usually basing this off the policies people of his particular political flavor say they want. What they end up doing is usually very much right-aligned.
replies(1): >>gruez+Rb
◧◩◪
9. halost+75[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:43:05
>>gruez+L2
In Canada and most of Europe, Joe Biden would be a hair right of centre-right on most things and centre-right on a few other topics. Only in America is he centre-left, which says a lot about America's Overton window shift.

Biden sounds a lot like Stephen Harper (pre-barbaric-practices-hotline) and just to the right of Brian Mulroney. Joe Clark would be well to his left.

replies(1): >>nozzle+tc
◧◩
10. hnpoli+o6[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:48:38
>>gruez+p1
Most of that stuff is a LARP.
◧◩
11. hnpoli+68[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:56:32
>>alsetm+u1
Moderators don't tolerate bigotry and racism on HN. I agree with that. But there were quite a few comments yesterday discussing Fyodor Dostoevsky who implied it was impossible for Russia to produce culture because it's people are monsters or something. Extreme ethnic hatred. So the users within the software community share many of the same faults regarding bigotry that the rest of humanity has.

Same goes for commentary on Chinese people or Palestinians, though nowhere near as extreme in animosity as that towards the Russian.

replies(1): >>dang+aM2
◧◩
12. Sunspa+S9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:04:11
>>alsetm+u1
The general problem with "racism" online is that people tend to use the word for things that they don't like hearing. E.g. there is an issue of some sort, let's say unemployment caused by subsidized temporary foreign workers being brought in to act as wage suppression for corporations. Saying that you have a concern with policy can often result in a response of "that's racist!".

This is a variation of the little boy who cried wolf. If "racism!" is cried for every single little thing that needs discussion, then one day it actually is racism and nobody will be listening.

replies(1): >>immibi+Ra
◧◩◪
13. hnpoli+T9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:04:11
>>gruez+L2
I disagree with your characterization of why I called the HN crowd, or technology professionals, far right. Having read my God how many comments, articles, tweets etc over the years. I see extremely conservative policy positions. No better example than asking a software engineer, developer VC there opinions on whether "gig" workers should be treated as full time employees with benefits, unionization etc.

The former use technology to do things economically to workers we haven't seen since Upton Sinclair's The Jungle. Like preventing a driver from getting new deliveries if those 10 minutes put him over 1 hour of work. It's robber barron extreme right wing economic policy.

replies(1): >>gruez+zc
◧◩◪
14. immibi+Ra[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:08:04
>>Sunspa+S9
Very few people ever complain about this in an egalitarian way, though, like: if wages are too low, let's make them higher. If the market isn't doing what we want, we should change the market.

Instead, it's always about how the immigrants should be locked up or deported. And that's always about immigrants from Mexico, never from Canada or other places.

◧◩◪◨
15. gruez+Rb[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:14:00
>>JohnMa+B4
No need to involve whatever "political flavor" of people making the judgement. If you compare his views to other politicians, or the electorate as a whole, he's clearly a centrist.
replies(1): >>JohnMa+Bf1
◧◩◪◨
16. nozzle+tc[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:17:27
>>halost+75
Comparing political rights, lefts and centers across cultures is futile, it's apples and oranges. For example, compare the immigration and integration policies of Biden [or the US] to that of Europe, and you'll find that he and most democrats are, for the most part, further "left."
replies(1): >>sangno+Aw1
◧◩◪◨
17. gruez+zc[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:17:46
>>hnpoli+T9
>No better example than asking a software engineer, developer VC there opinions on whether "gig" workers should be treated as full time employees with benefits, unionization etc.

And that's a "far right" position? So far as I can tell, even in europe, in most jurisdictions gig workers are treated as contractors rather than employees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gig_worker#Europe

replies(1): >>hnpoli+0e
18. bodiek+dd[view] [source] 2024-08-27 18:21:36
>>hnpoli+(OP)
The HN crowd is far left but they would never admit it.

Go watch Bill Clinton talk about illegal immigration and border security in the 90s. He'd be considered far right today. Read a book or newspaper from 50 years ago or 100 years ago and look at how much more freedom people had to build homes and businesses without a thousand licenses, permits, taxes and inspections.

There was a time in America where the notion of an income tax or of restrictions on running a business out of your home were considered far-left authoritarian and unconstitutional, but now we've all gotten used to a million regulations on how we use our private property, the government surveilling our communications and finances, government oversight and permission required for all activities.

Admittedly "left vs right" is hardly useful in contemporary politics, things are so multi-faceted and people's notions of what those terms mean is variable. But nonetheless, it's obvious that "the center" of American politics today is drastically far to the left from where it was previously.

In some sense, the 1960s counter-culture liberal progressives "won" and became the center and the establishment. A leftwing extremist in 1968 on issues of feminism, race, social welfare, tax policy, foreign policy, housing policy and probably others is a centrist today.

Environmental issues and unions are the only two areas I can think of where America has stayed the same or moved right since WWII.

replies(5): >>riboso+2i >>conste+Iy >>mosheg+Hg1 >>hnpoli+iw1 >>bbqfog+pv3
◧◩
19. hnpoli+hd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:22:02
>>hn-890+X1
Illegal immigration is a far right wing policy goal. It's how mega corps keep wages down. The old "we need illegal immigrants because who else is going to pick lettuce for $1 an hour!" When the answer is well without illegal immigration you'd be forced to pay a legally protected citizen a fair wage.

I think you're looking at the DEI phenomena incorrectly. It's a way for the economically comfortable class to signal virtue without having to experience any of its detractors. Check the Wikis of many DEI proponents and writers. They live in both highly segregated economic and racial neighborhoods.

They live a 1950's far right wing lifestyle at home but wax poetic about DEI for the virtue.

◧◩◪◨⬒
20. hnpoli+0e[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:24:48
>>gruez+zc
I mean these meanings aren't concrete. Left vs right etc. But historically it was a far right wing position to find ways to exploit labor for profit. The tech industry uses their skill set to accomplish this with algorithms.
replies(2): >>gruez+qj >>nec4b+2C
◧◩
21. riboso+2i[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:44:38
>>bodiek+dd
>But nonetheless, it's obvious that "the center" of American politics today is drastically far to the left from where it was previously.

Ronald Reagan gave 3 million illegal immigrants permanent resident status.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
22. gruez+qj[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 18:51:55
>>hnpoli+0e
>But historically it was a far right wing position to find ways to exploit labor for profit

and historically LGBT rights were far left positions. That doesn't mean they're far left positions today. Moreover if being pro-capital (as opposed to being labor) is "far right", then is being pro-labor "far left"? Is there even a "centrist" or non "far-left/right" position?

◧◩
23. Jasser+Rr[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 19:28:26
>>hn-890+X1
I find that HN is generally receptive of criticisms of those things granted you're using enough tact in your post and not just going "I'M SICK OF THESE WOKE JEWISH LEFTISTS RUINING EVERYTHING" in which case go to 4chan and cry there.
◧◩
24. conste+gx[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 19:51:06
>>alsetm+u1
Sure nobody says slurs. But I see misogyny and what I would classify as racist every time I'm on hackernews.

Complaining about Indians, complaining about women. But they don't even know that's what they're doing so you can't say "hey stop being sexist". They're surrounded by men all the time, of course it will never click in their heads.

◧◩
25. conste+Iy[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 19:58:33
>>bodiek+dd
The US is the most right-leaning country out of the first world.

> but now we've all gotten used to a million regulations on how we use our private property

Many of these originating from the right. Because the right is not, and has never been, a party of small government. They want big government, just their big government. That has meant historically enforcing slavery, then segregation, suppressing women's rights, suppressing abortion, dictating what you can do in the bedroom, and on and on and on. These are all conservative policy - and all HUGE government.

> it's obvious that "the center" of American politics today is drastically far to the left from where it was previously

Yes, this is called the progression of time. This is why people who are unable to change their mind over time end up falling behind and sounding crazy.

Have you ever asked an old dude about how they feel about black people? Whoa! Clearly they grew up in a different time. Some let that shit go like they should, some don't. Those that don't are destined to be left to the past.

Just a few decades ago a slight right winger might be anti-integration. Slight. A far right-winger would be lynching people in their neighborhood. So you're correct - we've moved past that.

And, in 40 years, if I personally don't change my beliefs, I will also sound crazy. To conservatives that's scary or something. To me, that's how the world works. I say either adapt or be relegated to the insane.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
26. nec4b+2C[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 20:16:56
>>hnpoli+0e
Can you give a historical example of such far right stance? Hitler's national socialist and Mussolini's fascist which are historically considered far right certainly didn't have such policies.
◧◩◪◨⬒
27. JohnMa+Bf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 00:48:30
>>gruez+Rb
I don’t think that’s clear at all, and I’m not involving the political flavor of people making a “judgment” - I’m saying his particular brand of establishment democrat politics all tend to have the same tendency.
◧◩
28. mosheg+Hg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 01:00:25
>>bodiek+dd
The US has a lot more people than it did 100 years ago. A lot of rules and regulations are a direct result of that.

Things change as we scale, for better or worse.

29. hnpoli+Jv1[view] [source] 2024-08-28 04:21:56
>>hnpoli+(OP)
Because orthodoxy blinds the masses, the people upvoting this are the very far-right who LARP as leftists/liberals I'm referring to lol. The detractors are actually liberals who have been painted as far right. Ideology is such a powerful delusion. Nobody can be sure of who they are due to external labeling.
◧◩
30. hnpoli+iw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 04:28:45
>>bodiek+dd
I think you have it backwards. Open borders are a right-wing goal. See Bernie Sanders comments on the subject circa 2015. How the Koch brothers want open borders to weaken labors leverage.

The wealthy and powerful don't benefit from citizenship. When you have wealth you can just pay for what you need or want. It's the common person who needs the benefits and protections that come from citizenship.

You're on the right path, pointing out how counter-culture liberals won but they are in fact right-wing. They LARP as liberals/leftists.

◧◩◪◨⬒
31. sangno+Aw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 04:31:54
>>nozzle+tc
Looking at the past 10-20 years, how are the immigration policies of the US or the Biden administration [1] further left than France, Germany or the UK - even under a conservative government post-Brexit? The US does have jus soli but I don't consider that to be a left wing thing.

1. Biden was promoting - and willing to sign into law - a border bill written by a Republican; it very nearly passed as it initially had bipartisan support before being scuppered by a presidential candidate.

◧◩◪
32. dang+aM2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 15:46:16
>>hnpoli+68
Just by coincidence, I was posting some moderation comments in that thread a couple hours ago: >>41379890 .

If you see a post that ought to have been moderated but hasn't been, that by no means implies that the post is ok or somehow blessed by the mods. The likeliest explanation is that we didn't see it*. We don't come close to seeing everything that gets posted here.

You can help by flagging such a post or emailing us at hn@ycombinator.com. It was only because someone brought those unacceptable comments to my attention that I was able to respond. We can't moderate what we don't see!

* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

◧◩
33. bbqfog+pv3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 19:59:28
>>bodiek+dd
Bill Clinton is definitely far-right.
[go to top]