zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Albert+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:03:19
> The fourth is a bit more borderline

The vast majority of comments on political/social topics fit your description. If you're thinking of the one I'm thinking of (not mine, if it matters), I can't think of any reasonable test that would conclude "this should be dead, but all those others can stay."

Edit: it's bigbacaloa's

replies(2): >>SpicyL+34 >>soneca+q8
2. SpicyL+34[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:21:06
>>Albert+(OP)
I agree that the vast majority of comments people would like to make on political/social topics violate the HN rules. Having seen political threads on Reddit, where any genuine insight is buried under a flood of namecalling and polemics, I think that's for the best.
replies(1): >>Albert+B8
3. soneca+q8[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:44:05
>>Albert+(OP)
I took the time to find it and dig why they were banned.

Here is dang’s explanation: >>37421874

It sounds a fair banning for me.

◧◩
4. Albert+B8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 17:44:50
>>SpicyL+34
> the vast majority of comments people would like to make on political/social topics violate the HN rules

Correction: delete the "would like to"

Also, comparing this to Reddit is sort of Godwin's Rule transposed to a different domain. "Better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick" is pretty much what you're saying.

[go to top]