zlacker

[return to "Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content"]
1. Albert+dY[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:42:57
>>southe+(OP)
If you want to see what's been "moderated" away from you on Hacker News:

Click your username at the upper right:

Turn on "showdead": showdead: yes. (defaults to "no")

There are a number of dead posts in this thread. I'd post some here (some of which don't appear to violate any HN guidelines, I'll note), but probably those same moderators would kill this one, too.

◧◩
2. SpicyL+111[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:54:08
>>Albert+dY
Of the four dead comments I see, two are content-free trolling and one is a completely unrelated discussion about Jim Jordan. The fourth is a bit more borderline, but I think a reasonable person could conclude that the commenter is more interested in getting people riled up than having a discussion.
◧◩◪
3. Albert+q31[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:03:19
>>SpicyL+111
> The fourth is a bit more borderline

The vast majority of comments on political/social topics fit your description. If you're thinking of the one I'm thinking of (not mine, if it matters), I can't think of any reasonable test that would conclude "this should be dead, but all those others can stay."

Edit: it's bigbacaloa's

◧◩◪◨
4. SpicyL+t71[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:21:06
>>Albert+q31
I agree that the vast majority of comments people would like to make on political/social topics violate the HN rules. Having seen political threads on Reddit, where any genuine insight is buried under a flood of namecalling and polemics, I think that's for the best.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Albert+1c1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:44:50
>>SpicyL+t71
> the vast majority of comments people would like to make on political/social topics violate the HN rules

Correction: delete the "would like to"

Also, comparing this to Reddit is sort of Godwin's Rule transposed to a different domain. "Better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick" is pretty much what you're saying.

[go to top]