zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. aguavi+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-26 19:08:07
Fair enough, and food for thought. Though one has to wonder how many people refused to respond (they apparently don't publish these numbers), or adjusted their response in accord with what they thought was expected of them.
replies(2): >>mopsi+03 >>codedo+Uz
2. mopsi+03[view] [source] 2024-08-26 19:22:53
>>aguavi+(OP)
Levada has published this to answer such questions: https://www.levada.ru/en/2023/04/24/are-meaningful-public-op...

In short, insignificant number of people refuse to answer, and answers cannot be discarded with "that's not what they really think" because surveys measure how people act in the public. One may very well be against the war in their thoughts, but if they go to a munitions factory every morning and fill shells with explosives all day and in the evenings cheer with neighbors over another strike at Ukrainian cities, then their innermost thoughts matter very little.

replies(1): >>surfin+Vf
◧◩
3. surfin+Vf[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-26 20:23:11
>>mopsi+03
[flagged]
4. codedo+Uz[view] [source] 2024-08-26 22:23:38
>>aguavi+(OP)
I think it would be better to look at number of volunteers signing a contract with military (there is not enough of them). Because one thing is to support the war in a phone poll and another thing is to take a gun and a bulletproof vest and go support it in real life.
[go to top]