zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. ned_at+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-07-30 19:32:21
We think BoxyHQ does a nice job.

We prefer our approach for basically two reasons:

1. BoxyHQ wants you to do SAML-over-OAuth. We support this -- especially for NextAuth compatibility. But we don't think it's always helpful.

2. We think our service is easier to use. We most commonly hear complaints from users/customers about complexity, so we try really hard to make SAML obvious and simple. Ultimately, it's up to you whether we meet that bar.

replies(1): >>crngef+hV
2. crngef+hV[view] [source] 2024-07-31 06:24:45
>>ned_at+(OP)
Would you mind elaborating a bit why you don’t think SAML-over-OAuth is a fits-all solution? To me it sounds like eating your cake (SAML) and having it too (not having to use SAML)
[go to top]