zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. PaulMe+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-07-30 19:20:23
Congrats on the launch! How does this compare to BoxyHQ's SAML Jackson [1]?

[1]: https://github.com/boxyhq/jackson

replies(1): >>ned_at+12
2. ned_at+12[view] [source] 2024-07-30 19:32:21
>>PaulMe+(OP)
We think BoxyHQ does a nice job.

We prefer our approach for basically two reasons:

1. BoxyHQ wants you to do SAML-over-OAuth. We support this -- especially for NextAuth compatibility. But we don't think it's always helpful.

2. We think our service is easier to use. We most commonly hear complaints from users/customers about complexity, so we try really hard to make SAML obvious and simple. Ultimately, it's up to you whether we meet that bar.

replies(1): >>crngef+iX
◧◩
3. crngef+iX[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-07-31 06:24:45
>>ned_at+12
Would you mind elaborating a bit why you don’t think SAML-over-OAuth is a fits-all solution? To me it sounds like eating your cake (SAML) and having it too (not having to use SAML)
[go to top]