zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. JumpCr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-06-13 21:03:11
> spending a lot is not the same as having large number of machinery produced

You’ve made a series of wrong, uncited claims. This is another one. (And the last one I’m responding to. You are not arguing in good faith.)

You called out electric motors. By mass and production volume, China is outstripped by Allied production.

> cheap energy is cool but Russia too has cheap energy

Much less than America production-wise. We’re counting volumes and mass, right?

> like India going to the moon at cost that would be considered pocket change in the USA

You really keep picking terrible examples to spitball on.

The SSLV’s launch cost per kg is over 3x Falcon 9’s [1][2]. American access to space is orders of magnitude cheaper and more extensive than India, Russia and China’s combined, despite massively higher labour costs and design requirements.

That said, India actually got to the Moon. Can’t say as much about Russia [3].

[1] https://www.newspace.im/launchers/isro

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_launch_market_competit...

[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_25

[go to top]