zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. monoca+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 16:19:14
If not for parody, it's normally a violation of likeness rights.
replies(1): >>postal+V
2. postal+V[view] [source] 2024-05-23 16:24:53
>>monoca+(OP)
Are those rights only celebrities enjoy?
replies(3): >>monoca+z1 >>dragon+H3 >>hehdhd+Q71
◧◩
3. monoca+z1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 16:27:29
>>postal+V
Not exactly.
◧◩
4. dragon+H3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 16:38:49
>>postal+V
Kind of, not in that there is a binary “celebrity/not-celebrity” divide, but the interest protected and the potential for damages from violating them are associated with the kind of public commercial exposure that is associated with celebrity.
◧◩
5. hehdhd+Q71[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 23:04:59
>>postal+V
No, they extend to anybody.
replies(1): >>postal+hN2
◧◩◪
6. postal+hN2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-24 15:47:43
>>hehdhd+Q71
So if you hire a voice actor that naturally sounds like a celebrity then you should be safe from any legal action. Otherwise they could sue each other.
replies(1): >>hehdhd+ks3
◧◩◪◨
7. hehdhd+ks3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-24 19:54:11
>>postal+hN2
Look up the concept of mens rea - the intent matters. If you hire somebody because you want a look/voice-alike that is legally distinct from hiring somebody who happens to have a certain voice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

[go to top]