zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. postal+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 16:15:47
And whats wrong with hiring an impersonator?
replies(1): >>monoca+E
2. monoca+E[view] [source] 2024-05-23 16:19:14
>>postal+(OP)
If not for parody, it's normally a violation of likeness rights.
replies(1): >>postal+z1
◧◩
3. postal+z1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 16:24:53
>>monoca+E
Are those rights only celebrities enjoy?
replies(3): >>monoca+d2 >>dragon+l4 >>hehdhd+u81
◧◩◪
4. monoca+d2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 16:27:29
>>postal+z1
Not exactly.
◧◩◪
5. dragon+l4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 16:38:49
>>postal+z1
Kind of, not in that there is a binary “celebrity/not-celebrity” divide, but the interest protected and the potential for damages from violating them are associated with the kind of public commercial exposure that is associated with celebrity.
◧◩◪
6. hehdhd+u81[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 23:04:59
>>postal+z1
No, they extend to anybody.
replies(1): >>postal+VN2
◧◩◪◨
7. postal+VN2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-24 15:47:43
>>hehdhd+u81
So if you hire a voice actor that naturally sounds like a celebrity then you should be safe from any legal action. Otherwise they could sue each other.
replies(1): >>hehdhd+Ys3
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. hehdhd+Ys3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-24 19:54:11
>>postal+VN2
Look up the concept of mens rea - the intent matters. If you hire somebody because you want a look/voice-alike that is legally distinct from hiring somebody who happens to have a certain voice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

[go to top]