zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. evryda+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 10:57:45
Not a lawyer, but wouldn't the important intent be the one when the voice is released, not the first moment someone gets hired? The economic harm happens when you publicize the voice in a way designed to gain value from Johannsen's reputation without her permission, not when you record it. The tweet and requests speak directly to that moment.
replies(1): >>gitfan+c2
◧
2. gitfan+c2[view] [source] 2024-05-23 11:16:24
>>evryda+(OP)
Yes, if she lost movie roles or other contracts because people assumed they could license the OpenAI voice then she could claim she was harmed. However OpenAI removed the voice and this situation is widely publicized. So it is hard to prove that she is being harmed now
[go to top]