zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. eschne+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:22:56
That and repeated, rejected attempts to hire ScarJo to do the voice. I expect they have ample documentation on that.
replies(1): >>Captai+22
2. Captai+22[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:38:35
>>eschne+(OP)
Did you not read the article? They did the voice months before that.
replies(1): >>chx+v6
◧◩
3. chx+v6[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 10:18:45
>>Captai+22
Then why did they ask her two days prior launch? A potential jury would be very, very curious knowing that.
replies(1): >>IanCal+Wa
◧◩◪
4. IanCal+Wa[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 10:58:31
>>chx+v6
A very simple answer is that they also wanted SJ as a voice. That doesn't mean the original voice was trying to copy SJ.

They had a voice, the natural comparison watching the interaction is to Her, and they there is likely still time to get actually SJs voice before a public rollout.

replies(2): >>chx+Ud >>XorNot+gg
◧◩◪◨
5. chx+Ud[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 11:24:15
>>IanCal+Wa
If you believe a known conman like Sam Altman didn't intend to steal SJ's voice I have a bridge to sell you.

See my comment from yesterday re him being a known conman: >>40435120

replies(2): >>kaashi+qs >>Havoc+ES
◧◩◪◨
6. XorNot+gg[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 11:40:25
>>IanCal+Wa
In particular, I'm pretty sure you can bake a voice model well enough for a canned demo in two days given we have cloning algs which will do it with 15 seconds of samples.

Production ready? Probably not, but demos don't have to be.

◧◩◪◨⬒
7. kaashi+qs[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 13:04:58
>>chx+Ud
I find this whole thing very confusing because I never thought the voices sounded identical or very similar. I was initially even more confused about this whole thing because I thought I couldn't find clips of the SJ AI voice only to realize I had but it didn't sound like her.

This opinion is independent of Sam being a conman, scammer, creepy Worldcoin weirdo, and so on.

◧◩◪◨⬒
8. Havoc+ES[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 15:21:11
>>chx+Ud
It’s not about what you believe but rather what you can prove
[go to top]