zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. chx+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 10:18:45
Then why did they ask her two days prior launch? A potential jury would be very, very curious knowing that.
replies(1): >>IanCal+r4
2. IanCal+r4[view] [source] 2024-05-23 10:58:31
>>chx+(OP)
A very simple answer is that they also wanted SJ as a voice. That doesn't mean the original voice was trying to copy SJ.

They had a voice, the natural comparison watching the interaction is to Her, and they there is likely still time to get actually SJs voice before a public rollout.

replies(2): >>chx+p7 >>XorNot+L9
◧◩
3. chx+p7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 11:24:15
>>IanCal+r4
If you believe a known conman like Sam Altman didn't intend to steal SJ's voice I have a bridge to sell you.

See my comment from yesterday re him being a known conman: >>40435120

replies(2): >>kaashi+Vl >>Havoc+9M
◧◩
4. XorNot+L9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 11:40:25
>>IanCal+r4
In particular, I'm pretty sure you can bake a voice model well enough for a canned demo in two days given we have cloning algs which will do it with 15 seconds of samples.

Production ready? Probably not, but demos don't have to be.

◧◩◪
5. kaashi+Vl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 13:04:58
>>chx+p7
I find this whole thing very confusing because I never thought the voices sounded identical or very similar. I was initially even more confused about this whole thing because I thought I couldn't find clips of the SJ AI voice only to realize I had but it didn't sound like her.

This opinion is independent of Sam being a conman, scammer, creepy Worldcoin weirdo, and so on.

◧◩◪
6. Havoc+9M[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 15:21:11
>>chx+p7
It’s not about what you believe but rather what you can prove
[go to top]