zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Captai+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 09:57:50
Maybe I'm missing obvious, but you seem to think it's disheartening when someone decides to not collaborate with a corporation, and the right choice for the corporation to ignore what the person thinks, "force" the collaboration anyways?! That seems outright crazy to me.
replies(1): >>lopken+r1
2. lopken+r1[view] [source] 2024-05-21 10:08:28
>>Captai+(OP)
I'm not talking about collaboration or lack thereof. I'm talking about Johansson's foolishness, and her subsequent tantrum after she rightfully regretted that poor judgment.
replies(1): >>ripe+eI1
◧◩
3. ripe+eI1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 19:41:57
>>lopken+r1
> Johansson's foolishness

Explain why you call a famous actress foolish if she refuses to give a corporation permission to use her voice. Your entire argument is built on this opinion.

replies(1): >>ecjhdn+X02
◧◩◪
4. ecjhdn+X02[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 21:16:22
>>ripe+eI1
I am as interested in the use of the words “tantrum” and “spite”, which that statement is not representative of.

It reads like projection of some other feelings or unstated interests.

[go to top]