zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. lopken+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 09:28:45
It is incredibly disheartening to see celebrities from traditional media expressing open disdain for the century's most revolutionary piece of technology.

Johansson was foolish to turn this down. This all sounds like she realized the mistake, regretted it, then sent her legal team to pursue this frivolous cease and desist out of spite.

I'm disappointed that OpenAI didn't see this for what it is, and decided to comply instead.

replies(3): >>Captai+U3 >>ecjhdn+3Y >>southe+vD3
2. Captai+U3[view] [source] 2024-05-21 09:57:50
>>lopken+(OP)
Maybe I'm missing obvious, but you seem to think it's disheartening when someone decides to not collaborate with a corporation, and the right choice for the corporation to ignore what the person thinks, "force" the collaboration anyways?! That seems outright crazy to me.
replies(1): >>lopken+l5
◧◩
3. lopken+l5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 10:08:28
>>Captai+U3
I'm not talking about collaboration or lack thereof. I'm talking about Johansson's foolishness, and her subsequent tantrum after she rightfully regretted that poor judgment.
replies(1): >>ripe+8M1
4. ecjhdn+3Y[view] [source] 2024-05-21 15:36:10
>>lopken+(OP)
> It is incredibly disheartening to see celebrities from traditional media expressing open disdain for the century's most revolutionary piece of technology.

Even though it threatens their livelihoods and is parasitic off their work?

It's not disheartening at all: it's positive.

> Johansson was foolish to turn this down. This all sounds like she realized the mistake, regretted it, then sent her legal team to pursue this frivolous cease and desist out of spite.

This all sounds like absurd wishful thinking.

◧◩◪
5. ripe+8M1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 19:41:57
>>lopken+l5
> Johansson's foolishness

Explain why you call a famous actress foolish if she refuses to give a corporation permission to use her voice. Your entire argument is built on this opinion.

replies(1): >>ecjhdn+R42
◧◩◪◨
6. ecjhdn+R42[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 21:16:22
>>ripe+8M1
I am as interested in the use of the words “tantrum” and “spite”, which that statement is not representative of.

It reads like projection of some other feelings or unstated interests.

7. southe+vD3[view] [source] 2024-05-22 12:18:10
>>lopken+(OP)
> to see celebrities from traditional media expressing open disdain for the century's most revolutionary piece of technology.

Really? AI has lots of potential but so far the big uses of the recent title wave have been an enormous increase in the creation of visual and text-based sludge, barely usable for anything serious most of it, by hustling online marketers and social media spammers.

Even where tools like GPT are used productively by people to simplify their business processes and so forth, every piece of information they claim has to be scrutinized for hallucinations to the point of them being useless as much more than idea generators for contexts where factual correctness isn't important...

Yay!

[go to top]