zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. insane+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 05:51:49
Actually it’s the copyright that is supposed to prevent a monopoly arising in the form of an OpenAI, or Google News back in the day.
replies(2): >>xbmcus+b3 >>insane+go8
2. xbmcus+b3[view] [source] 2024-05-21 06:29:10
>>insane+(OP)
Copyright was supposed to protect a small inventor or maker for a short period of time. But as those small makers became corporations and they lobbied for and were able to keep increasing the copyright periods from a few years to decades after the death of the individual the actual essence of the reason for copyright is gone. I am of the opinion that copyright apart from a fixed term should also have a form of value tax. So if the government is allowing you to have a monopoly on something you should pay a yearly tax on its valuation. And if it is not worth it to pay the copyright yearly tax to keep the copyright then the work is released to the commons.
replies(2): >>insane+uW >>rideon+a31
◧◩
3. insane+uW[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 13:29:11
>>xbmcus+b3
without copyright you have Google News sucking up all news organization content and robbing them of revenue (which is why news orgs sued and most went behind paywalls). Now OpenAI is doing the same thing to all content creators. Copyright law is the only thing protecting content creators or giving them any leverage at all. Copyright terms might be too long (we can debate that) but getting rid of it altogether would be the greater evil.
◧◩
4. rideon+a31[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 14:05:17
>>xbmcus+b3
You seem to be talking about patents.
5. insane+go8[view] [source] 2024-05-23 16:41:44
>>insane+(OP)
Woah, I didn't realize HN harbored this much anti-copyright sentiment.
[go to top]