zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nickth+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:13:48
If they didn’t use her actual voice for the training, didn’t hire voice talent to imitate her, didnt pursue her for a voice contract, didn’t make a reference to the movie in which she voices an AI, I feel OpenAI would have been on more stable legal footing. But they aren’t playing with a strong hand now and folded fast.
replies(2): >>rockem+k9 >>GuB-42+Tj
2. rockem+k9[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:12:19
>>nickth+(OP)
You're 100% correct and there's precedent

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midler_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

3. GuB-42+Tj[view] [source] 2024-05-21 01:26:23
>>nickth+(OP)
Not only that but they didn't credit the voice actress who sounds like her. If she was semi-famous and just naturally sounded like Scarlett Johansson, maybe they could have an argument: "it is not Scarlett, it is the famous [C-list actress] who worked in [production some people may know]".
[go to top]