zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. genevr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 09:41:52
I knew their vision of open source AI wouldn't last but it surprised me how fast it was.
replies(2): >>baq+F2 >>w0m+Ba
2. baq+F2[view] [source] 2024-05-18 10:27:44
>>genevr+(OP)
That vision, if it was ever there, died before ChatGPT was released. It was just a hiring scheme to attract researchers.

pg calls sama ‘naughty’. I call him ‘dangerous’.

replies(1): >>olalon+Jr
3. w0m+Ba[view] [source] 2024-05-18 12:07:32
>>genevr+(OP)
It was impractical from the start; they had to pivot before a they were able to get an LLM proper out (before ~anyone had heard of them)
◧◩
4. olalon+Jr[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 14:32:13
>>baq+F2
I'm still finding it difficult to understand how their move away from the non-profit mission was legal. Initially, you assert that you are a mission-driven non-profit, a claim that attracts talent, capital, press, partners, and users. Then, you make a complete turnaround and transform into a for-profit enterprise. Why this isn't considered fraud is beyond me.
replies(1): >>smt88+eF
◧◩◪
5. smt88+eF[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 16:36:13
>>olalon+Jr
My understanding is that there were two corporate entities, one of which was always for-profit.
[go to top]