zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. olalon+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 14:32:13
I'm still finding it difficult to understand how their move away from the non-profit mission was legal. Initially, you assert that you are a mission-driven non-profit, a claim that attracts talent, capital, press, partners, and users. Then, you make a complete turnaround and transform into a for-profit enterprise. Why this isn't considered fraud is beyond me.
replies(1): >>smt88+vd
2. smt88+vd[view] [source] 2024-05-18 16:36:13
>>olalon+(OP)
My understanding is that there were two corporate entities, one of which was always for-profit.
[go to top]