zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. bongod+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2024-05-15 15:28:58
That doesn't mean we pad all the rooms or ban peanuts. Yes, we should care for them but not at the detriment of the other 99%.
replies(1):
>>earthl+l2
◧
2. earthl+l2
[view]
[source]
2024-05-15 15:39:38
>>bongod+(OP)
Well, conveniently, this is benefitting the 1% much more than the 99%
replies(2):
>>llm_tr+N2
>>bongod+lg
◧◩
3. llm_tr+N2
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2024-05-15 15:41:49
>>earthl+l2
And a nanny state benefits a different 1% much more than the 99%.
replies(1):
>>fipar+d7
◧◩◪
4. fipar+d7
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2024-05-15 16:00:04
>>llm_tr+N2
That's a false dilemma.
replies(1):
>>llm_tr+Yi1
◧◩
5. bongod+lg
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2024-05-15 16:41:55
>>earthl+l2
Do you mean the richest 1%? How? Sounds pretty woo woo to me.
◧◩◪◨
6. llm_tr+Yi1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2024-05-15 22:39:55
>>fipar+d7
Having seem far too many orgs implode because of that new 1%, no it really isn't. Replacing greed with self-righteousness as the original sin of those in power does not help anyone.
[go to top]