zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
>dangerous for mentally unwell users

It's not our job to make the world safe for fundamentally unsafe people.

>>llm_tr+Fg1
I would argue that it is society’s job to care for its most vulnerable.

>>kettro+Fh1
That doesn't mean we pad all the rooms or ban peanuts. Yes, we should care for them but not at the detriment of the other 99%.

>>bongod+0i1
Well, conveniently, this is benefitting the 1% much more than the 99%

>>earthl+lk1
And a nanny state benefits a different 1% much more than the 99%.

>>llm_tr+Nk1
That's a false dilemma.