zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. xandri+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-01 16:34:21
Do you consider non-US applicants?
replies(1): >>dang+me
2. dang+me[view] [source] 2024-05-01 17:33:51
>>xandri+(OP)
You've posted that seven times in this thread already; can you please stop? I realize it's an important question but avoiding repetition is the cardinal principle here.
replies(2): >>xandri+vl >>CRConr+9Q2
◧◩
3. xandri+vl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-01 18:05:47
>>dang+me
Ok, my bad. I just found it important for me and other possible applicants.
replies(1): >>dang+243
◧◩
4. CRConr+9Q2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-02 14:08:57
>>dang+me
If you're so hot for enforcing your guidelines, then why don't you post those comments on the posts that skip "...include REMOTE, INTERNS and/or VISA..."? Then others wouldn't have to break other guidelines.

It certainly doesn't feel reasonable that "avoiding repetition" should be more of a "cardinal" principle than clarity on rather vital information in a job posting.

replies(1): >>dang+N33
◧◩◪
5. dang+N33[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-02 15:28:37
>>CRConr+9Q2
There are way too many of those for us to reply to them all, or even see them all.

Avoiding repetition is pretty much the optimizing principle of HN. I usually describe it as "optimizing for intellectual curiosity"* but those are almost the same thing.

* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...

replies(1): >>bpiche+2U4
◧◩◪
6. dang+243[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-02 15:30:18
>>xandri+vl
Appreciated!
◧◩◪◨
7. bpiche+2U4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-03 05:38:13
>>dang+N33
The r9k rule, in effect
[go to top]