zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Muffin+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-03-08 19:34:52
> path to revenue

There have to be at least 10 different ways between different cloud providers to run a distributed task queue. Amazon, Azure, GCP

Self-hosting RabbitMQ, etc.

I'm curious how they are able to convince investors that there is a sizable portion of market they think doesn't already have this solved (or already has it solved and is willing to migrate)

replies(3): >>Kinran+r1 >>leetro+mh >>Aeolun+K41
2. Kinran+r1[view] [source] 2024-03-08 19:40:42
>>Muffin+(OP)
There will be space for improvement until every cloud has a managed offering with exactly the same interface. Like docker, postgres, S3.
3. leetro+mh[view] [source] 2024-03-08 20:54:06
>>Muffin+(OP)
I am curious to see where they differentiate themselves on observability on the longer run.

Comparing to rabbitmq it should be easier to see what is in the queue itself without mutating it, for instance.

replies(1): >>Muffin+zO
◧◩
4. Muffin+zO[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-09 01:10:04
>>leetro+mh
https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/management
replies(1): >>leetro+tS
◧◩◪
5. leetro+tS[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-09 01:40:30
>>Muffin+zO
Sure, but to see what is in the queue you have to operate on it, mutating it. With this using postgres we can just look in the table.
6. Aeolun+K41[view] [source] 2024-03-09 04:36:03
>>Muffin+(OP)
> I'm curious how they are able to convince investors that there is a sizable portion of market they think doesn't already have this solved

Is there any task queue you are completely happy with?

I use Redis, but it’s only half of the solution.

[go to top]