Is this going to follow the "open core" pattern or will there be a different path to revenue?
There have to be at least 10 different ways between different cloud providers to run a distributed task queue. Amazon, Azure, GCP
Self-hosting RabbitMQ, etc.
I'm curious how they are able to convince investors that there is a sizable portion of market they think doesn't already have this solved (or already has it solved and is willing to migrate)
Comparing to rabbitmq it should be easier to see what is in the queue itself without mutating it, for instance.