zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. realfe+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-15 17:49:57
> Is it the innocence and defenselessness of children that gets society so riled up?

Yes.

replies(1): >>stavro+M
◧
2. stavro+M[view] [source] 2024-02-15 17:53:13
>>realfe+(OP)
Then why is the fictional depiction of dismsembering a child legal, but the fictional depiction of giving a child an orgasm illegal?
replies(1): >>almata+y4
◧◩
3. almata+y4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 18:10:16
>>stavro+M
It is probably the getting off on seeing those pictures that triggers the visceral response. If I make a movie of a child getting dismembered, I do not have the goal to create a sexual reaction in the audience. In contrast if I make fictional CP, I have the inherent goal in sexually exciting a certain category of people.
replies(2): >>stavro+x7 >>bdjckw+Wq
◧◩◪
4. stavro+x7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 18:24:14
>>almata+y4
Sure, but when has repressing urges led to anything good? I don't think CP will turn anyone into a pedophile, might as well let people satisfy their urges in a non-harmful way.
replies(1): >>almata+B9
◧◩◪◨
5. almata+B9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 18:32:38
>>stavro+x7
> Sure, but when has repressing urges led to anything good?

I mean we all repress certain behaviors to a certain extent. Some level of repression is healthy. I might have the urge to eat 5KG of ice cream every day but I keep it under control.

> I don't think CP will turn anyone into a pedophile, might as well let people satisfy their urges in a non-harmful way.

If need CP to get off you are a pedophile by definition because you are sexually attracted to children. I guess you meant watching CP will not automatically turn him into a child molester.

It is not that I agree with this new law. I do not see how it is enforceable. But I do see why people have a very negative view of it.

replies(1): >>stavro+kb
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. stavro+kb[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 18:38:17
>>almata+B9
> If need CP to get off you are a pedophile by definition because you are sexually attracted to children. I guess you meant watching CP will not automatically turn him into a child molester.

No, I meant a pedophile. It's not like people aren't attracted to children just because they haven't seen a CP video, therefore allowing fictional CP should be OK (it won't convert anyone into a pedophile).

I guess there's an argument to be made that a pedophile watching CP might be tempted to become a child molester, but then we should debate that, not issue blanket bans on fictional CP.

replies(1): >>almata+8f
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. almata+8f[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 18:54:00
>>stavro+kb
> it won't convert anyone into a pedophile

Thanks for clarifying, I misunderstood your earlier point then.

◧◩◪
8. bdjckw+Wq[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-15 19:40:27
>>almata+y4
so what was the goal of your child dismemberment movie?
[go to top]