zlacker

I am confused as to how discouraging procreation is racist?

>>127361+(OP)
LOL. You wrote a comment on how India is the main problem not the west (either now flagged or deleted). You singled out a race as being the problem.

>>10xDev+z
I didn't single out a specific race, I think, I just mentioned that it was that specific region of the world where the problem was located. As far as I'm aware it was nothing to do with discrimination because of a specific characteristic (which is the definition of racism). It was just that population growth in that region was very large combined with a high per-capita CO2 footprint.

Many NGOs are actively trying to increase the availability of birth control in such regions, they are aware of the problem with unplanned pregnancy in those parts of the world. I strongly doubt there's any racism behind it.

https://www.cgdev.org/blog/access-contraception-global-devel...

While in the west population growth is relatively slow and we still have a high per-capita CO2 footprint.

I guess I unintentionally touched a taboo subject (racism) that's not permitted by the current moral orthodoxy, which is no different to religion in the end? I hope I'm correct about this.

I don't really care if my posts are flagged or even if I get banned from this site completely, I am exercising my 1st Amendment protected freedom of speech rights. It's just that on the Internet every forum is privately owned, there is no "public square" here, and thus all are subject to moderation and censorship.

>>127361+N1
HN greys out the post if negatively voted. It can still be seen.

I like when HN has varying points of view with supporting links/data.

I’m with you on the population and per capita resource use.

Fact is that India is also slowly leveling out. Africa has a bunch of countries with high growth and that’s where the most humans are being added.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_populat...

>>127361+N1
> While in the west population growth is relatively slow and we still have a high per-capita CO2 footprint.

A footpirnt so high that it more than counterbalances population growth in the developing world.

>>127361+N1
> It was just that population growth in that region was very large combined with a high per-capita CO2 footprint.

I can't find the comment in question, but if the person above is right when they said it was about India then you are wrong that they have a high per-capita CO2 footprint.

They are under 2 tons CO2 per person per year.

That's about 40% of the world average, 25% of the EU, 22% of China, and 13% of the US.